Will the UFC's drug-testing program prove too credible for its own good?
Just a week ago, Brock Lesnar stood in a tent behind Las Vegas’s T-Mobile Arena celebrating a most improbable victory. He laughed. He strutted. He joked about wanting to drink a beer from a company that was not an official sponsor. It seemed a story too good to be true: How could a nearly 39-year-old man, five years removed from his last mixed martial arts fight, stomp back in the cage and look like he was a decade younger?
The US Anti-Doping Agency says this was likely a farce, for a possible anti-doping violation on a sample taken 12 days before last weekend’s UFC 200. If Usada ultimately proves that Lesnar tested positive for PEDs, that will mean half of 200’s original main event fighters have been caught cheating. In the end, the most honest man in Las Vegas that week might have been a man who wasn’t even there to fight, Nate Diaz, who at one point growled: “Everybody’s on steroids.”
Diaz and his brother Nick have long alleged that most of the UFC’s fighters take steroids, through their proof has largely come in profane anecdotal screeds, most from Nick who points out that seem hypocritical given the other fighters’ attempts to manipulate competition.
In a way, the UFC themselves are helping to prove them right. A year ago, the organization handed their drug testing operation to Jeff Novitzky the federal agent who led the infamous Balco investigation in the early 2000s. This was a calculated risk on the UFC’s part. You don’t hire the man who brought down Lance Armstrong and Marion Jones and ruined the legacies of Roger Clemens and Barry Bonds if you aren’t prepared for a flood of positive PED tests.
“We’re putting this program out there as a gold standard,” . “So that Major League Baseball, so that the NFL says ‘Hey, here’s what a real, solid comprehensive, robust program looks like.’ And we’re hoping in years to come that they follow suit.”
The UFC’s departing owners Lorenzo and Frank Fertitta wanted to push their sport into the mainstream, where the biggest money lies. Novitsky brings respect. Who knows how much adding him and his testing program was worth to the when WME-IMG bought the organization from them? But there is no doubt they bought credibility whey they recruited Nowitzky.
Now comes the tricky part. How far do the UFC’s new owners want to go with their “gold standard” testing program? Most sports leagues and organizations aren’t truly committed to testing. They do enough to say they are serious about stopping PEDs but nothing much changes. A few athletes get caught. Suspensions are handed out, but no one wants to risk losing their biggest names.
Whether they wanted to or not, the UFC has. Nine days ago they endured the humiliation of after Usada notified UFC officials of a positive test less than 72 hours before his rematch with Daniel Cormier. Now they must deal with Lesnar, whose 28 June test was flagged on Friday by Usada officials. They were clearly rattled in the days before 200 as they peeled Jones’s picture off the side of the arena and quickly added Anderson Silva, another fighter who has tested positive for PEDs, to the schedule.
Will the UFC continue to want to be that “gold standard”? Can they stand having cards fall apart at the last minute, potentially undercutting pay-per-view sales? It appears their drug program is working. Do they want to build on that success? Do the new owners even view losing half the main event to positive PED tests a success?
The irony of Lesnar’s test is that it came after the UFC granted him a controversial exemption from their normal requirement that a fighter go through four months of testing before his bout. The exemption was procedural matter. Since Lesnar didn’t re-sign with the UFC until six weeks before 200 there was no way he could undergo four months of tests. He was still subject to testing upon re-joining the organization.
At the time Hunt – who is now demanding half of Lesnar’s record $2.5m purse from 200 – complained about the exemption, that Lesnar is “juiced to the gills”. Lesnar shrugged off those criticisms and even scorned Jones the day after that fighter’s positive test was announced. “It’s unprofessional for anybody to do that,” he said at a press conference. Then he smiled, knowing his fight with Hunt had just been given more prominence adding: “Merry Christmas to Brock Lesnar”
Instead of Santa Claus, Lesnar got the agent who has already ruined the too-good-to-be-true stories of Armstrong, Jones and Bonds. Jeff Novitzky has given the UFC exactly what their owners wanted: credibility. But is it the kind of credibility they are willing to embrace as cards dissolve and fans grumble? How many posters do they want to pull off of arena walls in the days before fights? How many celebratory post-fight press conferences will turn out to be worthless as Lesnar’s last weekend?
“I believe any man can do anything he wants if you put your mind to it,” Lesnar said after his victory.
He meant to sound inspirational. Now he sounds empty.
In Jeff Novitzky the UFC might have the person who can prove Nate Diaz right. They can establish a testing program that could be a model for all sports. But that credibility comes at a price, especially when many fans don’t seem to care if Lesnar is “doped to the gills”. Now that they’ve been sold, will the UFC still want to be a leader in the fight against doping?